Tuesday, 18 February 2014

Re Organization of States annoncé Guha

Formation of the twenty ninth state of Telangana has been a roller coaster sentimental ride for more than 11 crores of the region .It certainly could have been resolved in a more amicable manner. The feeling of the party which feels aggrieved and alienated could be assuaged in a better manner than done. Political compulsions have made the bifurcation more painful and rhetorical rabble rousing.
In 1947, the boundaries of several old States of India were changed in order to create new States. This was mostly on linguistic grounds. However some States were created not on the basis of language but to recognize differences based on culture, ethnicity or geography. The States Reorganization Commission implementation and reluctance by senior leaders to accept it and the benefits it gave on account of Federalism has been dealt with aptly by historians like Ramchandra Guha.

Modern political social analysts have cited better implantation and decentralized administration and as benefits of Smaller States. Removal of Economic disparity and removal of alienation are harped upon by the champions of Federalism.

Most of these arguments hold their forte in elms of strengthening of democracy and respect for diversity or plurality.

The issue of smaller states have however acquired some new dimensions in recent past. New dimensions of corruption, disenchantment of masses with the political class and increasing gap between the referred two have cropped up.
Formation and the functioning of small states in recent times has brought these new three dimensional to the fore. With small assemblies in vague , a group of rogue legislators can hold the provincial government to ransom. In an Assembly of two digit strength, MLAs in single digit make the political scenario fluid. The price of Governance in these small states is negotiated in terms of Crores and ministerial berths to state the minimum. The nuisance created by a small group of legislators can cause more damage to institutions of Democracy in small states is evident.

An independent MLA becoming the Chief Minister of a State in recent past and tales of money-laundering and  properties in a disproportionate assets against him and  his alleged associates is folklore now .The ex Chief Minister was well supported by  five political parties and three independents ,all three of whom  made Ministers. His rule of two years aided in moving the state to verge of financial crisis. When formed, the State was one of the two surplus budget state. Nearly similar imprudent financial scenario prevails in smaller states.

The streamlining of administration occurred on account of small administrative units is a mirage. The lack of preparedness by smaller states in face of last year’s natural calamity has further cast doubts on the administrative efficiency which was cited as main reason for bifurcation of States. The other agencies involved clearly indicated the lack of specific information was lost in the red tape of a small state bureaucracy.

The democratic wings of governance instead of strengthening have given way to more cynicism, incompetence and loss of cohesion in making of small sates